<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Tony Arcieri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bascule@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="window.open('https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&tf=1&to=bascule@gmail.com&cc=&bcc=&su=&body=','_blank');return false;">bascule@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">

<div class="">No, fewer seems better</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>And now I saw Trevor's reply, which kind of reminds me of CodesInChaos's analysis of the CurveCP handshake:</div><div><br>

</div><div><a href="http://codesinchaos.wordpress.com/2012/09/09/curvecp-1/">http://codesinchaos.wordpress.com/2012/09/09/curvecp-1/</a></div><div><br></div><div>See Issue 2: Client Authentication </div></div><div><br></div>

-- <br>Tony Arcieri<br>
</div></div>