[messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers
burdges at gnunet.org
Fri Oct 6 09:39:59 PDT 2017
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:42 +0200, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> If ACKs do not advance the ratchet, then one could offer a "current
> safety number" derived similarly to ratchet header encryption keys,
Oops, ACKs that do not advance the ratchet do not make this work. There
are more complex schemes that work under assumptions like synchronized
clocks, but probably not worth the effort.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Messaging