<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 5:38:18 PM Nathan of Guardian <<a href="mailto:nathan@guardianproject.info">nathan@guardianproject.info</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:<br>
> On 4 November 2014 10:43, Joseph Bonneau <<a href="mailto:jbonneau@gmail.com" target="_blank">jbonneau@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Hopefully we will be launching a more detailed version next year with many<br>
> > more evaluation criteria but would be curious to hear feedback on this<br>
> > version from other folks working in this space.<br>
><br>
> Icons of the tools, please.<br>
><br>
> I have a lot of minutia feedback otherwise:<br>
><br>
> Why was ChatSecure + Orbot not featured? For that matter, why require<br>
> Orbot at all?<br>
<br>
Well, I am happy to have the Orbot integration pointed out, but I would<br>
have added two more questions "Is your IP address visible and logged by<br>
the service provider?" and "Can the fact you are using the service by<br>
seen and/or blocked by your ISP/telco?",</blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> and then we, and maybe a few<br>
other apps, would have had even *more* green checks to be proud of.<br>
<br>
Otherwise, I don't really sweat the featured or not, but I don't really<br>
understand why that user interface choice was really necessary.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Nathan of Guardian<br>
<a href="mailto:nathan@guardianproject.info" target="_blank">nathan@guardianproject.info</a><br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Messaging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Messaging@moderncrypto.org" target="_blank">Messaging@moderncrypto.org</a><br>
<a href="https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging" target="_blank">https://moderncrypto.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/messaging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>