[messaging] Provable (private) conversation while allowing (somewhat) precise redaction

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Oct 6 17:25:13 PDT 2014

On 10/6/2014 4:44 PM, Tamme Schichler wrote:
> The problem is that B has a history of lying
> about such conversations, so A wants to be able to prove as much as
> becomes necessary to deflect allegations, but also little as possible to
> protect the privacy of either side or third parties (or the other way
> around, as usual the solution would ideally be symmetric).

Sounds like a classic requirement for Non-Repudiation of Recipient:



Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the Messaging mailing list