[noise] New draft: "noh2" branch
Jason A. Donenfeld
Jason at zx2c4.com
Mon Aug 31 03:17:13 PDT 2015
Regarding termination --
For my specific use case, I'm not sure how it'd be useful, as I'm simply
encapsulating IP packets inside encrypted UDP packets. Ephemerals are
already wiped out every 2 minutes if they're not ratcheted/renegotiated so
I don't need an explicit way of saying "I won't be sending any more data".
And I don't risk truncation attacks anyway, because of the poly1305
authenticator tag. You mentioned that file formats which rely on EOF will
need a termination mark, but I don't see why: if a noise-encrypted file is
truncated, won't the poly1305 tag be incorrect too?
Jason
--
Jason A. Donenfeld
Deep Space Explorer
fr: +33 6 51 90 82 66
us: +1 513 476 1200
www.jasondonenfeld.com
www.zx2c4.com
zx2c4.com/keys/AB9942E6D4A4CFC3412620A749FC7012A5DE03AE.asc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/noise/attachments/20150831/b662256e/attachment.html>
More information about the Noise
mailing list