[noise] XEdDSA and Noise
Trevor Perrin
trevp at trevp.net
Tue Oct 25 19:23:05 PDT 2016
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2016 5:50 AM, "Trevor Perrin" <trevp at trevp.net> wrote:
>> I don't have an immediate use case for this
>
> dhss could be replaced with sig in some patterns. I think an advantage of
> this might be avoiding KCI to the responder prior to the initiator's first
> transport message providing confirmation (per KEA+C).
Sounds right.
> OTOH, I really really like the simplicity of signature-less noise.
Yeah, me too, but this is something to mull over.
Trevor
More information about the Noise
mailing list