[noise] No need in noise pipes for NoiseSocket

Trevor Perrin trevp at trevp.net
Sun Feb 26 12:18:03 PST 2017

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Alexey Ermishkin
<scratch.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> Another question that I'd like to discuss is that we don't need any complex
> patterns for NoiseSocket to work. The first pattern message is anyway always
> XX "e" message. And we can use it in case the following "IK" messages cannot
> be processed correctly.

I think I agree that NoiseSocket should not support pipes or 0-RTT
encryption, initially.  The goal should just be a simple 1-RTT


More information about the Noise mailing list