[noise] Pattern transformations

[Alex]

On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:12:09 -0400
Alex <alex at centromere.net> wrote:

> In section two, you describe how protocol naming is affected by the
> extension. Without some rigorous definitions for protocol naming,
> we're going to find that transformation composition is impossible,
> since the way protocol names are modified is ad-hoc.
> 

Moreover, the order in which the transformations are composed matters.

(g . f) != (f . g)

-- 
Alex