[noise] Invalid point attacks
trevp at trevp.net
Thu Mar 30 14:03:22 PDT 2017
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Trevor Perrin <trevp at trevp.net> wrote:
>>> 1. It prevents accidents in which a peer might shoot himself in the
>>> foot with a bad RNG for ephemerals and/or bad static key.
>> It doesn't prevent that. A low-entropy private key multiplied by the
>> base point is still a valid public key.
> Yea obviously. But usually when RNGs fail, they wind up just returning
> all zeros. By "usual" I mean the majority of things I've dealt with in
> the wild. Since it's nearly free (quick comparison of 4 qwords) to
> implement, this seems like a nice failsafe.
Typically X25519 and X448 private scalars are created by taking some
RNG output, then setting some high and low bits ("clamping"). This
clamping would turn an all-zeros RNG output into a non-zero scalar.
So even if you assume all-zeros RNG output is a common failure (I'm
not sure about that), the check you're recommending would not catch
More information about the Noise