[noise] Reworking PSK usage

[Alex]

On Tue, 2 May 2017 21:17:07 +0000
Trevor Perrin <trevp at trevp.net> wrote:

> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Alex <alex at centromere.net> wrote:
> > (C) Where does the "psk" designation belong? For example, which one
> > of these is correct?:
> >
> > * Noise_NNhfs+psk0
> > * Noise_NNpsk0+hfs  
> 
> Hm, I guess this becomes immediately relevant with "fallback" and
> "psk?".  Maybe if the order of application doesn't matter, make it
> alphabetical?  So, XXfallback+psk0?
> 

The order of application does matter, at least when it comes to
transformations.

-- 
Alex