[noise] Reworking PSK usage

Alex alex at centromere.net
Sun May 7 14:52:19 PDT 2017

On Sun, 7 May 2017 23:33:14 +0200
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Alex <alex at centromere.net> wrote:
> > How would that generalize for pskN?  
> psk0: first token after e of first message.
> pskN for N>0: last token of Nth message.

Does this imply that a psk token located anywhere else results in an
invalid pattern?


More information about the Noise mailing list