[noise] Mechanical definition of "fallback" modifier

[Rhys Weatherley]

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Trevor Perrin <trevp at trevp.net> wrote:

> Nice!, I'm eager to see how that works out, and what issues pop up.
>

Thanks for the detailed feedback.  I will report back once I've implemented
and tested it.

Should the definition of the "fallback" modifier go into rev33 or into an
extension document?  Perhaps Noise Pipes can be spun off completely into an
extension now?  An important extension to be sure, but maybe no longer
necessary in the core.

Cheers,

Rhys.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/noise/attachments/20170611/762c93a0/attachment.html>