[noise] NoiseSocket API feedback
Trevor Perrin
trevp at trevp.net
Tue Apr 24 01:40:33 PDT 2018
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Nemanja Mijailovic
<metalnem at mijailovic.net> wrote:
> I think it may be difficult to define the API that is easy to directly implement in all programming languages. The spec itself is clear enough, so I wouldn’t miss the API section much if we remove it.
Yeah, I think I agree with you and Christopher [1] that the API isn't
adding much value, so I'll prepare a NoiseSocket draft that removes it
(and also clarifies the padding of handshake payloads, as was
discussed).
Trevor
[1] https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/noise/2018/001543.html
More information about the Noise
mailing list