[noise] rev34 draft

[Justin Cormack]

I just read it again and it reads very well, and has lots of improvements.

I have a couple of notes about things that maybe need mentioning but they
can wait until have thought about them more.

Justin


On Tue, 1 May 2018, 11:51 Trevor Perrin, <trevp at trevp.net> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm still planning to publish revision 34 to the website next week, so
> would appreciate final review and comments:
>
> https://github.com/noiseprotocol/noise_spec/tree/rev34
> https://github.com/noiseprotocol/noise_spec/blob/rev34/output/noise.pdf
>
> After that I think we should do a revision 35 just for internal re-org
> (move more things into appendices, maybe integrate PSK better into the
> text), as discussed with Nadim.
>
> Trevor
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Trevor Perrin <trevp at trevp.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Trevor Perrin <trevp at trevp.net> wrote:
>> >  (5) It becomes confusing with Bob-initiated pattern notation, since
>> > we'd have to decide - and people would have to remember - whether "s"
>> > vs "rs" stands for Alice vs Bob or Initiator vs Responder, and whether
>> > to reorder the parenthesized arguments or not.  Probably the best
>> > choice would be to not modify the parenthesized text, i.e. here are
>> > Alice and Bob-initiated notations for XK:
>> >
>> > XK(s, rs):
>> >   <- s
>> >   ...
>> >   -> e, es
>> >   <- e, ee
>> >   -> s, se
>> >
>> > XK(s, rs):
>> >   -> s
>> >   ...
>> >   <- e, es
>> >   -> e, ee
>> >   <- s, se
>>
>> I reversed the arrows but forgot to reverse the DHs for the
>> Bob-initiated pattern:
>>
>> XK(s, rs):
>>   -> s
>>   ...
>>   <- e, se
>>   -> e, ee
>>   <- s, es
>>
>> Trevor
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noise mailing list
> Noise at moderncrypto.org
> https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/noise
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/noise/attachments/20180501/67cd7d16/attachment.html>